什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i9-12900KF 或 Intel Core i5-13500HX? 哪种处理器更快？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-12900KF has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2021.
Intel Core i5-13500HX has a base frequency of 1.50 GHz (4.70 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
更多的核心数量
2 more cores
14
共同立场 Intel Core i9-12900KF 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
共同立场 Intel Core i5-13500HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i9-12900KF
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i 13000H
Intel Core i5
13
-
Mobile
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Raptor Cove
8x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
14
20
是
没有
-
-
1.50 GHz (4.70 GHz)
1.80 GHz (3.50 GHz)
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
Intel UHD Graphics 770
12
32
11
300 MHz
1500 MHz
3
64 GB
Q4/2021
256
10 nm
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-13500HX 和 Intel Core i9-12900KF. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
是
128 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5600LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-5200
-
-
89.6 GB/s
5.0 x 20
是
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i9-12900KF 和 Intel Core i5-13500HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
55 W
157 W
45 W
86 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i9-12900KF 和 Intel Core i5-13500HX, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Raptor Lake H
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
20 MB
24 MB
-
Q1/2023
BGA 1744
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-12900KF | Intel Core i5-13500HX | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 323.798146 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 179.637853 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -44.5 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 327.858488 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 218.555412 samples/min Submissions: 21 | -33.3 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 335.27653 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 229.204276 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -31.6 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 340.815064 samples/min Submissions: 22 | 223.399093 samples/min Submissions: 11 | -34.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900KF | 10268.669468 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 10M / 22 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27) Duration: 973.836 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13500HX | 6394.516063 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 156.384 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
