什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-12600K 或 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-12600K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2021.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. 24 / 48 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 280 W. 发布于 2019-11-25.
需要考虑的原因 更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 9% higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 3% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
14 more cores
共同立场 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-12600K
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 和 Intel Core i5-12600K. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-12600K 和 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-12600K 和 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12600K | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 270.839071 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 575.144457 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +112.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 215.302947 samples/min Submissions: 35 | 507.849063 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +135.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 211.269775 samples/min Submissions: 38 | 509.39129 samples/min Submissions: 14 | +141.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 208.231011 samples/min Submissions: 37 | 515.517252 samples/min Submissions: 12 | +147.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 224.769114 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 518.786537 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +130.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 217.066649 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 506.847355 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +133.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 5773.672055 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 10 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z690-P Duration: 173.2 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 26624.777017 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 48 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / TRX40 AORUS MASTER Duration: 37.559 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |