什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-12500H 或 Intel Core i3-1215U? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i5-12500H has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 12 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i3-1215U has a base frequency of 1.20 GHz. 6 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 108% 更好的时钟速度
1.20 GHz
更多的核心数量
6 more cores
6
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 2% higher specified turbo frequency
4.40 GHz
共同立场 Intel Core i5-12500H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
45 W
共同立场 Intel Core i3-1215U 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-12500H
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i 1200P/1200U
Intel Core i3
12
-
Mobile
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
2x Golden Cove
4x Gracemont
1.2 GHz
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
6
8
是
没有
4.4 GHz
-
1.8 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
12.1
64
13
300 MHz
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 64 (Alder Lake)
1100 MHz
4
32 GB
Q1/2022
512
10 nm
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i3-1215U 和 Intel Core i5-12500H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
没有
64 GB
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-5200
4.0 x 28
是
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-12500H 和 Intel Core i3-1215U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
15 W
55 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-12500H 和 Intel Core i3-1215U, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Alder Lake U
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
4.5 MB
10 MB
Q1/2022
BGA 1744
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12500H | Intel Core i3-1215U | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 149.533488 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 73.61233 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -50.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 137.652303 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 57.167815 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -58.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 142.023008 samples/min Submissions: 27 | 43.630394 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -69.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 143.993174 samples/min Submissions: 23 | 60.504984 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -58.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 149.547825 samples/min Submissions: 54 | 52.301314 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -65.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 140.3944 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 56.727939 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -59.6 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 140.320401 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 73.041097 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -47.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-12500H 和 Intel Core i3-1215U.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
