什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-12450H 或 AMD Ryzen 5 3600? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-12450H has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz. 8 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2019-07-07.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
2 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 5% higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i5-12450H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 80% 更好的时钟速度
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-12450H
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 和 Intel Core i5-12450H. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-12450H 和 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-12450H 和 AMD Ryzen 5 3600, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12450H | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 123.485631 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 128.540512 samples/min Submissions: 21 | +4.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 134.270491 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 140.794564 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +4.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 110.70322 samples/min Submissions: 34 | 125.382089 samples/min Submissions: 122 | +13.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 102.588353 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 126.57574 samples/min Submissions: 110 | +23.4 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 103.626894 samples/min Submissions: 35 | 119.368378 samples/min Submissions: 94 | +15.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 154.902324 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 142.181394 samples/min Submissions: 28 | -8.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 108.222767 samples/min Submissions: 59 | 121.261015 samples/min Submissions: 115 | +12.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 106.644675 samples/min Submissions: 45 | 129.089503 samples/min Submissions: 72 | +21.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 113.188249 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 129.990808 samples/min Submissions: 193 | +14.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 5835.6676 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Duration: 171.36 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12450H | 3526.453692 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 283.571 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |