共同立场 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Published results: 17
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 143.808753 samples/min Submissions: 24 |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 129.990808 samples/min Submissions: 193 |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 146.456901 samples/min Submissions: 6 |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 129.089503 samples/min Submissions: 72 |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 142.181394 samples/min Submissions: 28 |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 121.261015 samples/min Submissions: 115 |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 145.54638 samples/min Submissions: 26 |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 119.368378 samples/min Submissions: 94 |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 138.743361 samples/min Submissions: 7 |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 126.57574 samples/min Submissions: 110 |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 144.069772 samples/min Submissions: 34 |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 125.382089 samples/min Submissions: 122 |
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 136.026885 samples/min Submissions: 14 |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 140.192918 samples/min Submissions: 7 |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 140.794564 samples/min Submissions: 19 |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 142.727671 samples/min Submissions: 19 |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 128.540512 samples/min Submissions: 21 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 5835.6676 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Duration: 171.36 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
比较流行基准的分数 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 与其他处理器相比，了解CPU处理内容时的真实速度.
测试包括数学计算、创建3D模型、加密货币挖掘、单核和多核模式下的测试.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Lower values are better; time in seconds.
Higher values are better in this metric.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted. Index 0–100: equal-weight mean of each score relative to the best saved score among models with both tests. Tests: Cinebench R23 Multi-Core + Geekbench 5 Multi-Core. This index does not predict performance in every workload.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
*
PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.
这些数值被用来选择最佳的冷却系统和电源。
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
