최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? Intel Core i5-12450H 또는 AMD Ryzen 5 3600? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-12450H has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz. 8 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 에 출시 Q1/2022.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 에 출시 2019-07-07.
고려해야 하는 이유 더 많은 코어 수
2 more cores
더 빠른 터보 클럭 속도
주변 5% higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
공통 위치 Intel Core i5-12450H 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
더 빠른 클럭 속도
주변 80% 더 나은 클럭 속도
공통 위치 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
Intel Core i5-12450H
비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.
콘텐츠 인코딩 및 디코딩에 사용되는 코덱이 내장되어 있습니다. 필요한 작업 속도를 크게 높입니다.
지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 그리고 Intel Core i5-12450H. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.
TDP 요구 사항 비교 Intel Core i5-12450H 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 Intel Core i5-12450H 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 3600, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12450H | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 123.485631 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 128.540512 samples/min Submissions: 21 | +4.1 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 134.270491 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 140.794564 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +4.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 110.70322 samples/min Submissions: 34 | 125.382089 samples/min Submissions: 122 | +13.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 102.588353 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 126.57574 samples/min Submissions: 110 | +23.4 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 103.626894 samples/min Submissions: 35 | 119.368378 samples/min Submissions: 94 | +15.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 154.902324 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 142.181394 samples/min Submissions: 28 | -8.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 108.222767 samples/min Submissions: 59 | 121.261015 samples/min Submissions: 115 | +12.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 106.644675 samples/min Submissions: 45 | 129.089503 samples/min Submissions: 72 | +21.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 113.188249 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 129.990808 samples/min Submissions: 193 | +14.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 5835.6676 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Duration: 171.36 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12450H | 3526.453692 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 283.571 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |