什么是最好的选择 Intel Celeron G3950 或 Intel Core i3-8100T? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Celeron G3950 has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 51 W. 发布于 Q1/2017.
Intel Core i3-8100T has a base frequency of 3.10 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q2/2018.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Celeron G3950 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 3% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
2 more cores
共同立场 Intel Core i3-8100T 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Celeron G3950
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i3-8100T 和 Intel Celeron G3950. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Celeron G3950 和 Intel Core i3-8100T Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Celeron G3950 和 Intel Core i3-8100T, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Celeron G3950 和 Intel Core i3-8100T.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.