什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 或 Intel Core i5-11400T? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has a base frequency of 3.1 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2019-09-30.
Intel Core i5-11400T has a base frequency of 1.30 GHz. 6 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 35 W. 发布于 Q1/2021.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 138% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
6 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 16% higher specified turbo frequency
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i5-11400T 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-11400T 和 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 和 Intel Core i5-11400T Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 和 Intel Core i5-11400T, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | 12893.410178 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 77.559 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11400T | 2577.60525 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 6 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: LENOVO / 31A7 Duration: 387.957 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |