什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 或 Intel Core i5-13400F? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT has a base frequency of 3.9 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 105 W. 发布于 2020-07.
Intel Core i5-13400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz). 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更多的核心数量
2 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i5-13400F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-13400F 和 AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 和 Intel Core i5-13400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 和 Intel Core i5-13400F, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 5
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | Intel Core i5-13400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 186.740974 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 200.318835 samples/min Submissions: 71 | +7.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 180.462869 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 185.751865 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +2.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 181.247539 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 180.143499 samples/min Submissions: 33 | -0.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 195.454238 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 198.561504 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +1.6 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 193.483552 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 191.443574 samples/min Submissions: 42 | -1.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | 5494.082873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 14 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D99) Duration: 182.014 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | 7260.107885 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B550-E GAMING Duration: 137.739 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 和 Intel Core i5-13400F.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.