什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 或 Intel Core i7-1255U? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2019-07-07.
Intel Core i7-1255U has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 10 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 112% 更好的时钟速度
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
4 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 12 % higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i7-1255U 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-1255U 和 AMD Ryzen 5 3600. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 和 Intel Core i7-1255U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 和 Intel Core i7-1255U, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Intel Core i7-1255U | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 128.540512 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 72.500587 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -43.6 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 136.026885 samples/min Submissions: 14 | 71.046234 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -47.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 125.382089 samples/min Submissions: 122 | 73.828397 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -41.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 126.57574 samples/min Submissions: 110 | 72.326994 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -42.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 119.368378 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 72.096635 samples/min Submissions: 25 | -39.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 121.261015 samples/min Submissions: 115 | 78.804508 samples/min Submissions: 60 | -35.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 129.990808 samples/min Submissions: 193 | 76.175019 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -41.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 5835.6676 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Duration: 171.36 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1255U | 2858.106447 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 8 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: LENOVO / 21E60050UK Duration: 349.882 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |