NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Różnice Specyfikacje Benchmarki Testimonials

Różnice

Powody do rozważenia
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Zgłoś błąd

Powody do rozważenia
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Zgłoś błąd

Wyższa prędkość zegara

Wokół 4% lepsza prędkość zegara

1.56 GHz 1.5 GHz
Więcej pamięci

300% więcej pamięci

24 GB 6 GB

Pozycje we wszystkich rankingach

Wspólne stanowiska NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti GPU w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.

Passmark Performance Test GPU

1 place

Specyfikacje

Dane techniczne

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Informacje ogólne

Porównanie podstawowych danych technicznych kart graficznych NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti oraz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, chip, jednostki przetwarzania informacji.

Architektura

Turing Ampere
CUDA Cores

1536 10752
Execution Units

1536 -
Układ GPU

TU116 GA102-350-A1
L1 Cache

64 KB 128 KB
L2 Cache

1,536 MB 6 MB
Jednostki wyjściowe renderingu

48 112
Jednostki tekstury

96 336
Na podstawie

- GA102
Shader

- 10752

Ustawienia pamięci

Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.

Memory Bandwidth

288 GB/s 1,008 GB/s
Memory Bus

192 bit 384 bit
Memory Clock

1500 MHz -
Memory Data Rate

12 Gbps -
Rozmiar pamięci

6 GB 24 GB
Typ pamięci

GDDR6 GDDR6X
Memory Speed (legacy frequency label)

- 1300 MHz

Częstotliwość zegara

Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.

Częstotliwość podstawowa

1500 MHz 1560 MHz
Maksymalna częstotliwość

1770 MHz 1860 MHz
Overclocking

- Nie

Zużycie energii

Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.

Graphics Card Power

120 W 450 W
Maximum GPU Temperature

95 °C 92 °C
System Power Supply

450 W (Minimum system power requirement) 850 W (System power requirement)
TDP

120 W 450 W

Interfejsy

Łączność i połączenia.

DisplayPort Ports

1 × DisplayPort 1.4a 3 × DisplayPort 1.4a
Porty DVI

1 × DVI -
Porty HDMI

1 × HDMI 2.1 1 × HDMI 2.1
Max. Wyświetlacze

3 4
Other Display Outputs (unparsed)

DP 1.4a; HDMI 2.0b; DL-DVI-D HDMI
PCIe Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Power Connectors

8-pin 3x PCIe 8-pin cables (adapter in box) OR 450W or greater PCIe Gen 5 cable
HDCP Version

- 2.3

Dane techniczne

Dane techniczne, które są w pełni wykorzystywane w grach komputerowych.

CUDA

7.5 -
DirectX

12.1 12_2
Maks. rozdzielczość

3840 × 2160 7680 × 4320
OpenCL

3.0 3.0
OpenGL

4.6 4.6
Shader Model

6.7 (6.4) 6.6
Vulkan

1.3 1.3

Wymiary

Różnica w wielkości, wadze i gnieździe porównywanych urządzeń

Wysokość

35 mm -
Długość

229 mm -
Slot Size

Dual-slot -
Width

111 mm -

Więcej informacji

Porównanie interfejsów i dat wydania dla GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti oraz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.

Manufacturer specification scope

NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ. NVIDIA Founders Edition/reference design. Clock specifications apply to gaming use. AIB shipping specifications and complete-system power needs may differ.
Multi-monitor support

Tak -
Process Technology

12 nm 8 nm
Data wydania

Q1/2019 -

Theoretical Performance

FP16 (theoretical)

10.87 TFLOPS (2:1) 40 TFLOPS
FP32 (theoretical)

5.437 TFLOPS 40 TFLOPS
FP64 (theoretical)

169.9 GFLOPS (1:32) 0.625 TFLOPS
Pixel Rate

84.96 GPixel/s 208.3 GPixel/s
Texture Rate

169.9 GTexel/s 625.0 GTexel/s

Benchmarki

Badania eksploatacyjne GPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 14

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Result difference¹
Blender 5.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows	683.894754 samples/min Submissions: 24	5250.819731 samples/min Submissions: 11	+667.8 %
Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Linux	740.029214 samples/min Submissions: 8	5601.471369 samples/min Submissions: 7	+656.9 %
Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Windows	686.620607 samples/min Submissions: 18	5459.157697 samples/min Submissions: 5	+695.1 %
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Linux	786.110434 samples/min Submissions: 8	5309.43807 samples/min Submissions: 24	+575.4 %
Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Windows	741.389241 samples/min Submissions: 54	5585.151795 samples/min Submissions: 115	+653.3 %
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Linux	768.158139 samples/min Submissions: 12	4979.851473 samples/min Submissions: 8	+548.3 %
Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Windows	743.205149 samples/min Submissions: 26	5700.575741 samples/min Submissions: 51	+667.0 %
Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Windows	755.765834 samples/min Submissions: 19	5490.159484 samples/min Submissions: 35	+626.4 %
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Linux	759.319183 samples/min Submissions: 9	5972.585335 samples/min Submissions: 15	+686.6 %
Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows	740.194812 samples/min Submissions: 45	5673.136912 samples/min Submissions: 51	+666.4 %
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Linux	802.562755 samples/min Submissions: 5	6034.022292 samples/min Submissions: 7	+651.8 %
Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Windows	788.558198 samples/min Submissions: 19	5769.869986 samples/min Submissions: 32	+631.7 %

More tests: 2

Test and settings	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Result difference¹
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Linux	803.98389 samples/min Submissions: 6	6168.026652 samples/min Submissions: 16	+667.2 %
Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Windows	776.75797 samples/min Submissions: 72	5124.064923 samples/min Submissions: 111	+559.7 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.