ベストな選択とは NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti または NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti? どのグラフィックカードが速い?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a base frequency of 1.5 GHz. メモリサイズ 6 GB. メモリータイプ GDDR6. で発売されました。 Q3/2019.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has a base frequency of 1.56 GHz. メモリサイズ 24 GB. メモリータイプ GDDR6X. で発売されました。 Q1/2022.
考慮すべき理由
考慮すべき理由 クロックの高速化
周辺 4% クロックスピードの向上
その他のメモリ
300メモリ増量
共通ポジション NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでGPUを使用。.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
グラフィックスカードの基本技術データの比較 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti と NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, チップ、情報処理装置.
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
コネクティビティと接続.
コンピュータゲームに活かされる技術データ.
比較したデバイスのサイズ、重量、スロットの違い
GPUのインターフェースと発売時期の比較 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti と NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Shared tests with results for both models: 14
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows | 683.894754 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 5250.819731 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +667.8 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Linux | 740.029214 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 5601.471369 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +656.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / OPTIX / Windows | 686.620607 samples/min Submissions: 18 | 5459.157697 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +695.1 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Linux | 786.110434 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 5309.43807 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +575.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / OPTIX / Windows | 741.389241 samples/min Submissions: 54 | 5585.151795 samples/min Submissions: 115 | +653.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Linux | 768.158139 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 4979.851473 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +548.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / OPTIX / Windows | 743.205149 samples/min Submissions: 26 | 5700.575741 samples/min Submissions: 51 | +667.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / OPTIX / Windows | 755.765834 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 5490.159484 samples/min Submissions: 35 | +626.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Linux | 759.319183 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 5972.585335 samples/min Submissions: 15 | +686.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / OPTIX / Windows | 740.194812 samples/min Submissions: 45 | 5673.136912 samples/min Submissions: 51 | +666.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Linux | 802.562755 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 6034.022292 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +651.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / OPTIX / Windows | 788.558198 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 5769.869986 samples/min Submissions: 32 | +631.7 % |
| Test and settings | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Linux | 803.98389 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 6168.026652 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +667.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / OPTIX / Windows | 776.75797 samples/min Submissions: 72 | 5124.064923 samples/min Submissions: 111 | +559.7 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.