ベストな選択とは Intel Core i9-13900H または AMD Ryzen 5 3600? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか？
最適なプロセッサーを選ぶために、比較を用意しました。それぞれの仕様とベンチマークを比較してみてください。
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2023.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 2019-07-07.
考慮すべき理由 より多くのコア数
8 more cores
6
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900H 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
場所
共通ポジション AMD Ryzen 5 3600 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i9-13900H
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
AMD Ryzen 3000
Ryzen
3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop / Server
Desktops / Boxed Processor
Ryzen 3000 Series
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
-
-
-
-
normal
6
12
はい
はい
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
-
-
-
-
None
-
-
-
-
-
-
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 と Intel Core i9-13900H. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
はい
128 GB
-
2
DDR4
PCIe 4.0 x16
20
4.0
3200
はい
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i9-13900H と AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
95 °C
-
-
-
65 W
65 W
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i9-13900H と AMD Ryzen 5 3600, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Matisse (Zen 2)
-
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
3 MB
32 MB
Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition / Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
2019-07-07
-
AM4
TSMC 7nm FinFET
AMD-V, SVM
Matisse
0.375 MB
100-100000031BOX
100-100000031MPK
100-000000031
AMD Wraith Stealth
AMD Wraith Stealth
Shared tests with results for both models: 13
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 203.029651 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 128.540512 samples/min Submissions: 21 | -36.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 230.78364 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 140.192918 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -39.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 165.950779 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 140.794564 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -15.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 239.172077 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 144.069772 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -39.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 125.382089 samples/min Submissions: 122 | -31.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 180.382133 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 138.743361 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -23.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 126.57574 samples/min Submissions: 110 | -35.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 119.368378 samples/min Submissions: 94 | -42.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 195.081862 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 142.181394 samples/min Submissions: 28 | -27.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 121.261015 samples/min Submissions: 115 | -20.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 129.089503 samples/min Submissions: 72 | -35.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 258.238432 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 143.808753 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -44.3 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | 129.990808 samples/min Submissions: 193 | -38.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 5835.6676 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Duration: 171.36 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
複数のベンチマークの結果をもとに、より正確に両者の性能差を見積もることができます。 Intel Core i9-13900H と AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
合成テストの値を比較して、最適なプロセッサを選ぼう!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
