최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? Intel Core i9-13900H 또는 AMD Ryzen 5 3600? 哪种处理器更快？
최고의 프로세서를 선택하는 데 도움이 되는 비교 자료를 준비했습니다. 사양과 벤치마크를 비교해 보세요.
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 에 출시 Q1/2023.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 에 출시 2019-07-07.
고려해야 하는 이유 더 많은 코어 수
8 more cores
6
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
공통 위치 Intel Core i9-13900H 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
장소
공통 위치 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
Intel Core i9-13900H
비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.
AMD Ryzen 3000
Ryzen
3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop / Server
Desktops / Boxed Processor
Ryzen 3000 Series
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
-
-
-
-
normal
6
12
예
예
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.
-
-
-
-
None
-
-
-
-
-
-
콘텐츠 인코딩 및 디코딩에 사용되는 코덱이 내장되어 있습니다. 필요한 작업 속도를 크게 높입니다.
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 그리고 Intel Core i9-13900H. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.
예
128 GB
-
2
DDR4
PCIe 4.0 x16
20
4.0
3200
예
TDP 요구 사항 비교 Intel Core i9-13900H 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
95 °C
-
-
-
65 W
65 W
아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 Intel Core i9-13900H 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 3600, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.
Matisse (Zen 2)
-
-
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
3 MB
32 MB
Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition / Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
2019-07-07
-
AM4
TSMC 7nm FinFET
AMD-V, SVM
Matisse
0.375 MB
100-100000031BOX
100-100000031MPK
100-000000031
AMD Wraith Stealth
AMD Wraith Stealth
Shared tests with results for both models: 13
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 203.029651 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 128.540512 samples/min Submissions: 21 | -36.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 230.78364 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 140.192918 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -39.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 165.950779 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 140.794564 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -15.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 239.172077 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 144.069772 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -39.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 125.382089 samples/min Submissions: 122 | -31.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 180.382133 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 138.743361 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -23.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 126.57574 samples/min Submissions: 110 | -35.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 119.368378 samples/min Submissions: 94 | -42.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 195.081862 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 142.181394 samples/min Submissions: 28 | -27.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 121.261015 samples/min Submissions: 115 | -20.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 129.089503 samples/min Submissions: 72 | -35.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 258.238432 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 143.808753 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -44.3 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | 129.990808 samples/min Submissions: 193 | -38.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 5835.6676 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Duration: 171.36 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
여러 벤치마크 결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 제품 간의 성능 차이를 보다 정확하게 예측할 수 있습니다. Intel Core i9-13900H 그리고 AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
합성 테스트 값을 비교하여 최고의 프로세서를 선택하세요!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
