Cuál es la mejor opción Intel Core i9-13900H o AMD Ryzen 5 3600? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Hemos preparado una comparación para ayudarte a elegir el mejor procesador. Compara sus especificaciones y puntos de referencia.
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Publicado en Q1/2023.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en 2019-07-07.
Razones a tener en cuenta Más número de núcleos
8 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i9-13900H CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
Posiciones comunes AMD Ryzen 5 3600 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Intel Core i9-13900H
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por AMD Ryzen 5 3600 y Intel Core i9-13900H. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Compara los requisitos del TDP Intel Core i9-13900H y AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por Intel Core i9-13900H y AMD Ryzen 5 3600, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Shared tests with results for both models: 13
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 203.029651 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 128.540512 samples/min Submissions: 21 | -36.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 230.78364 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 140.192918 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -39.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 165.950779 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 140.794564 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -15.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 239.172077 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 144.069772 samples/min Submissions: 34 | -39.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 125.382089 samples/min Submissions: 122 | -31.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 180.382133 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 138.743361 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -23.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 126.57574 samples/min Submissions: 110 | -35.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 119.368378 samples/min Submissions: 94 | -42.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 195.081862 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 142.181394 samples/min Submissions: 28 | -27.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 121.261015 samples/min Submissions: 115 | -20.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 129.089503 samples/min Submissions: 72 | -35.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 258.238432 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 143.808753 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -44.3 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | 129.990808 samples/min Submissions: 193 | -38.9 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 5835.6676 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Duration: 171.36 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Basándose en los resultados de varias pruebas comparativas, puede estimar con mayor precisión la diferencia de rendimiento entre Intel Core i9-13900H y AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
Compare los valores de las pruebas sintéticas y elija el mejor procesador.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.