Cuál es la mejor opción Intel Core Ultra 9 285K o AMD Ryzen 9 5900? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Publicado en Q4/2024.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en Q2/2021.
Razones a tener en cuenta Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 6% mejor velocidad de reloj
Más número de núcleos
12 more cores
Mayor velocidad de reloj turbo
En 21% higher specified turbo frequency
Razones a tener en cuenta Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por AMD Ryzen 9 5900 y Intel Core Ultra 9 285K. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Compara los requisitos del TDP Intel Core Ultra 9 285K y AMD Ryzen 9 5900 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por Intel Core Ultra 9 285K y AMD Ryzen 9 5900, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6588 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 356 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 16722 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 902 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 42705 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2353 points |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 9189 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 556 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 13084.381174 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI Duration: 76.427 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |