Quel est le meilleur choix ? Intel Core Ultra 9 285K ou AMD Ryzen 9 5900? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Sorti en Q4/2024.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Sorti en Q2/2021.
Raisons de considérer Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée
Autour de 6% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
12 more cores
Vitesse d'horloge turbo plus élevée
Autour de 21% higher specified turbo frequency
Raisons de considérer Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par AMD Ryzen 9 5900 et Intel Core Ultra 9 285K. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Comparez les exigences du TDP Intel Core Ultra 9 285K et AMD Ryzen 9 5900 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par Intel Core Ultra 9 285K et AMD Ryzen 9 5900, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6588 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 356 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 16722 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 902 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 42705 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2353 points |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 9189 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 556 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 13084.381174 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI Duration: 76.427 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |