Qual é a melhor escolha Intel Core Ultra 9 285K ou AMD Ryzen 9 5900? Qual é o processador mais rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 24 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Lançado em Q4/2024.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Lançado em Q2/2021.
Razões a considerar Maior velocidade do relógio
Por volta de 6% melhor velocidade do relógio
Mais número de núcleos
12 more cores
Maior velocidade do relógio turbo
Por volta de 21% higher specified turbo frequency
Razões a considerar Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Informação de base sobre os processadores a serem comparados, séries, geração e segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
A placa gráfica interna não afecta o desempenho da CPU, realiza o trabalho da placa gráfica na sua ausência ou em dispositivos móveis.
Codecs incorporados utilizados para codificar e descodificar o conteúdo. Acelera significativamente as operações necessárias.
Tipos, quantidade de canais de RAM suportados por AMD Ryzen 9 5900 e Intel Core Ultra 9 285K. Dependendo das placas-mãe, podem ser suportadas frequências de memória mais altas ou mais baixas.
Comparar os requisitos de TDP do TDP Intel Core Ultra 9 285K e AMD Ryzen 9 5900 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instruções adicionais suportadas por Intel Core Ultra 9 285K e AMD Ryzen 9 5900, tecnologias de máquinas virtuais e tecnologia de processos.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6588 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 356 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 16722 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 902 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 42705 points | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2353 points |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 9189 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 556 points | System: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB CPU / power label: 285K, RTX 5070 Ti, 128 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 13084.381174 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B860-PLUS WIFI Duration: 76.427 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |