Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

Matrox LUMA A310 vs NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Released
Q3/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310 or NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB has a maximum frequency of 1.512 GHz. Memory size 80 GB. Memory type HBM2e. Released in Q3/2022.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 24% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.512 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • More memory

    95% more memory

    80 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    8 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB, chip, information processing units.

  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow GA100
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 160
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 432
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 80 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow HBM2e
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.512 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 3 Gbps
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 5120 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.065 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.41 GHz
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 250 W
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12.2
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 267 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 112 mm
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB and Matrox LUMA A310.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q3/2022
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 7 nm

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB Performance relative to other GPU chips
153%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
136%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
100%
89%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
-->

Latest comparisons