What's the best choice SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 4G GDDR6 4GB or Matrox LUMA A310F? Which graphics card is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 4G GDDR6 4GB Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6.
Matrox LUMA A310F has a base frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.
Reasons to consider Common positions SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 4G GDDR6 4GB GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
No data
Reasons to consider Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 4G GDDR6 4GB
Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 4G GDDR6 4GB and Matrox LUMA A310F, chip, information processing units.
Intel Arc A310 Graphics
-
-
-
-
ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
16
6
768
96
32
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
64 bit
15.5 Gbps
4 GB
GDDR6
124 GB/s
1938 MHz
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
2000 MHz
-
2000 MHz
Yes
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
-
-
-
50 W-33 %
-
Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 4G GDDR6 4GB and Matrox LUMA A310F.
Air cooling
Radial
1 x 70 mm
-
0 dB / Silent
-
Connectivity and connections.
4 × DisplayPort 2.1
-
PCIe 4.0 x8
-
2.3
4
-
-
-
Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.
12_2 (Ultimate)
No
No LED lighting
7680 × 4320
Yes
Built-in support for video and image compression standards.
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
No
Decode / Encode
The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices
-
69 mm
168 mm
1 PCIe-Slots
-
-
Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Matrox LUMA A310F and SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 4G GDDR6 4GB.
-
-
data sheet
-
LUMA-A310F
6 nm
Q2/2023
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
