Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA TITAN RTX

Matrox LUMA A310 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Released
Q4/2018
Overall score
star star star star star
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA TITAN RTX

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310 or NVIDIA TITAN RTX? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

NVIDIA TITAN RTX has a maximum frequency of 1.350 GHz. Memory size 24 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2018.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 33% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.350 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
Videokards Reasons to consider
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Report a bug
  • More memory

    83% more memory

    24 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions NVIDIA TITAN RTX GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA TITAN RTX
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA TITAN RTX, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow NVIDIA TITAN RTX
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow TU102-400-A1 (Turing)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 72
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 4608
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 96
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 288
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 72
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 24 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.750 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 14 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 672 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA TITAN RTX. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.350 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.770 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 280 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 89 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA TITAN RTX.

  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 2 x 90 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Passive left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow --
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow 1
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 267 mm
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 116 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 35 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU NVIDIA TITAN RTX and Matrox LUMA A310.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2018
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow 2,499 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310 left arrow 900-1G150-2500-000
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA TITAN RTX.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
16.31
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
-->

Latest comparisons