Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Matrox LUMA A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Released
Q3/2020
Overall score
star star star star star
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has a maximum frequency of 1.4 GHz. Memory size 24 GB. Memory type GDDR6X. Released in Q3/2020.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 30% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.4 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • More memory

    83% more memory

    24 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Passmark Performance Test GPU
    2 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, chip, information processing units.

  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow GA102-300-A1
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 10496
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 112
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 328
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 24 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6X
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.219 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 19.5 Gbps
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.4 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.695 GHz
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 350 W
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and Matrox LUMA A310.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q3/2020
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 8 nm

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Performance relative to other GPU chips
108%
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
100%
GeForce RTX 3090
99%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
99%
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
94%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
-->

Latest comparisons