Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G

Matrox LUMA A310 vs Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Released
Q2/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310 or Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G has a maximum frequency of 2.055 GHz. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2022.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1163 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    2.055 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    1271 place
  • Battlefield 5
    1428 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1488 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2319 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    1236 place
  • Cyberpunk 2077
    41 place
  • GTA 5 Benchmark (Grand Theft Auto V)
    30 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow Navi 23 KXT (RDNA 2)
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 2048
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 128
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 32
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.190 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 17.5 Gbps
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.055 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.635 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow 2.410 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 180 W+ 2 %
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310 and Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G.

  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 3 x 80 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Passive left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 2x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 2x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 282 mm
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 113 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 41 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G and Matrox LUMA A310.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q2/2022
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310 left arrow GV-R665XTEAGLE-8GD
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310 and Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310
10.79
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
37 fps (avg)
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6650 XT EAGLE 8G
-->

Latest comparisons