What's the best choice Intel Core i9-12900K or Intel Core i7-12700KF? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-12900K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2021.
Intel Core i7-12700KF has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2021.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 3% better clock speed
More number of cores
4 more cores
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 4% higher specified turbo frequency
Reasons to consider
Intel Core i9-12900K
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i7-12700KF and Intel Core i9-12900K. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i9-12900K and Intel Core i7-12700KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i9-12900K and Intel Core i7-12700KF, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-12900K | Intel Core i7-12700KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 330.848277 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 299.652343 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -9.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 371.614153 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 261.198774 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -29.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 364.623081 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 283.116113 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -22.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 405.81974 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 349.422858 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -13.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 347.867139 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 289.770122 samples/min Submissions: 95 | -16.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 334.608444 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 274.137726 samples/min Submissions: 32 | -18.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 331.433386 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 276.449649 samples/min Submissions: 55 | -16.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 348.527563 samples/min Submissions: 101 | 273.398609 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -21.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 341.86517 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 289.715603 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -15.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 387.437158 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 347.011907 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -10.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 342.220842 samples/min Submissions: 83 | 278.887706 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -18.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 1387 points | System: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB CPU / power label: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 120 points | System: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB CPU / power label: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 9357.425585 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 22 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO Z690-A WIFI (MS-7D25) Duration: 106.867 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700KF | 7153.689873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760 GAMING X DDR4 Duration: 139.788 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 27485 points | System: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock CPU / power label: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 2032 points | System: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock CPU / power label: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |