Jaki jest najlepszy wybór Intel Core i9-12900K lub Intel Core i7-12700KF? Który procesor jest szybszy?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-12900K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Wydany w Q4/2021.
Intel Core i7-12700KF has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Wydany w Q4/2021.
Powody do rozważenia Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 3% lepsza prędkość zegara
Większa liczba rdzeni
4 more cores
Wyższa prędkość zegara turbo
Wokół 4% higher specified turbo frequency
Powody do rozważenia
Intel Core i9-12900K
Informacje ogólne o porównywanych procesorach, serii, generacji i segmencie rynku.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics nie wpływa na wydajność procesora, wykonuje pracę karty graficznej w przypadku jej braku lub na urządzeniach mobilnych.
Wbudowane kodeki wykorzystywane do kodowania i dekodowania treści. Znacznie przyspiesza wymagane operacje.
Typy, kanały ilość pamięci RAM obsługiwanych przez Intel Core i7-12700KF oraz Intel Core i9-12900K. W zależności od płyt głównych mogą być obsługiwane wyższe lub niższe częstotliwości pamięci.
Porównaj wymagania TDP Intel Core i9-12900K oraz Intel Core i7-12700KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektura, interfejsy, dodatkowe instrukcje obsługiwane przez Intel Core i9-12900K oraz Intel Core i7-12700KF, technologie maszyn wirtualnych i technologie procesowe.
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-12900K | Intel Core i7-12700KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 330.848277 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 299.652343 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -9.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 371.614153 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 261.198774 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -29.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 364.623081 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 283.116113 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -22.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 405.81974 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 349.422858 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -13.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 347.867139 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 289.770122 samples/min Submissions: 95 | -16.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 334.608444 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 274.137726 samples/min Submissions: 32 | -18.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 331.433386 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 276.449649 samples/min Submissions: 55 | -16.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 348.527563 samples/min Submissions: 101 | 273.398609 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -21.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 341.86517 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 289.715603 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -15.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 387.437158 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 347.011907 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -10.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 342.220842 samples/min Submissions: 83 | 278.887706 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -18.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 1387 points | System: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB CPU / power label: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 120 points | System: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB CPU / power label: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 9357.425585 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 22 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO Z690-A WIFI (MS-7D25) Duration: 106.867 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700KF | 7153.689873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760 GAMING X DDR4 Duration: 139.788 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 27485 points | System: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock CPU / power label: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 2032 points | System: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock CPU / power label: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |