Quel est le meilleur choix ? Intel Core i9-12900K ou Intel Core i7-12700KF? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-12900K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Sorti en Q4/2021.
Intel Core i7-12700KF has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Sorti en Q4/2021.
Raisons de considérer Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée
Autour de 3% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge
Plus grand nombre de cœurs
4 more cores
Vitesse d'horloge turbo plus élevée
Autour de 4% higher specified turbo frequency
Raisons de considérer
Intel Core i9-12900K
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par Intel Core i7-12700KF et Intel Core i9-12900K. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Comparez les exigences du TDP Intel Core i9-12900K et Intel Core i7-12700KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par Intel Core i9-12900K et Intel Core i7-12700KF, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-12900K | Intel Core i7-12700KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 330.848277 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 299.652343 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -9.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 371.614153 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 261.198774 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -29.7 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 364.623081 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 283.116113 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -22.4 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 405.81974 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 349.422858 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -13.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 347.867139 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 289.770122 samples/min Submissions: 95 | -16.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 334.608444 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 274.137726 samples/min Submissions: 32 | -18.1 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 331.433386 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 276.449649 samples/min Submissions: 55 | -16.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 348.527563 samples/min Submissions: 101 | 273.398609 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -21.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 341.86517 samples/min Submissions: 51 | 289.715603 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -15.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 387.437158 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 347.011907 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -10.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 342.220842 samples/min Submissions: 83 | 278.887706 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -18.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 1387 points | System: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB CPU / power label: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 120 points | System: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB CPU / power label: Core i9-12900K, 16 GB Source minimum runtime: 0 minutes. Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 9357.425585 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 22 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO Z690-A WIFI (MS-7D25) Duration: 106.867 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700KF | 7153.689873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760 GAMING X DDR4 Duration: 139.788 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 27485 points | System: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock CPU / power label: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 2032 points | System: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock CPU / power label: CB: Core i9-12900K @ Stock Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |