Intel Celeron J4005
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3750H. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2017
Intel Celeron J4005
Intel Celeron J4005
Released
Q1/2019
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

What's the best choice Intel Celeron J4005 or AMD Ryzen 7 3750H? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron J4005 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 10 W. Released in Q4/2017.

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H has a base frequency of 2.3 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 35 W. Released in Q1 2019.

Differences

  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    10 W left arrow 35 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron J4005 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    866 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    955 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1086 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1203 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1417 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    601 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    718 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    621 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    715 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1104 place
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H Reasons to consider
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 15% better clock speed

    2.3 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    4 left arrow 2
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 48 % higher specified turbo frequency

    4 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 7 3750H CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    340 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    272 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    442 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    363 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    609 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    564 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    120 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    209 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    188 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    454 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron J4005 Intel Celeron J4005
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 left arrow AMD Ryzen 3000H
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Ryzen
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 2
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Form Factor
    - left arrow Laptops / Desktops
  • Series
    - left arrow Ryzen 3000 Series
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2 GHz left arrow 2.3 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    2.7 GHz left arrow 4 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    2.7 GHz left arrow -
  • Max. Boost Clock
    - left arrow 4 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    - left arrow 3.5 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 10
  • Generation
    9.5 left arrow 8
  • GPU Frequency
    250 MHz left arrow 1400 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel UHD Graphics 600 left arrow Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
  • GPU Turbo
    700 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 2 GB
  • Release date
    Q4/2017 left arrow Q1/2018
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 640
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Graphics Cores
    - left arrow 10
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 7 3750H and Intel Celeron J4005. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Max. Memory
    8 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • PCIe lanes
    6 left arrow 12
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe
    - left arrow PCIe 3.0
  • System Memory Specification
    - left arrow 2400
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD Ryzen 7 3750H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    - left arrow 105 °C
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    10 W left arrow 35 W
  • TDP down
    - left arrow 12 W
  • Configurable TDP
    - left arrow 12-35 W
  • Default TDP
    - left arrow 35 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Gemini Lake left arrow Picasso (Zen+)
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L2-Cache
    - left arrow 2 MB
  • L3-Cache
    4 MB left arrow 4 MB
  • Release date
    Q4/2017 left arrow Q1/2019
  • Socket
    BGA 1090 left arrow FP5
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 12nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • Codename
    - left arrow Picasso
  • L1-Cache
    - left arrow 0.375 MB
  • Manufacturer product ID (tray)
    - left arrow YM3700C4T4MFG
  • Official source
    - left arrow https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/processors.html
  • Operating systems
    - left arrow Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition / Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
  • Verification scope
    - left arrow Explicit manufacturer fields refreshed; other original historical fields retained, not all reverified. Partial composite conflicts are preserved.
  • Verified on
    - left arrow 2026-10-01

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD Ryzen 7 3750H.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

79.000000
Intel Celeron J4005
146.000000
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

149.000000
Intel Celeron J4005
789.000000
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

377.000000
Intel Celeron J4005
818.000000
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

649.000000
Intel Celeron J4005
3155.000000
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

134.000000
Intel Celeron J4005
1792.000000
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

0.920000
Intel Celeron J4005
1.760000
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

1.750000
Intel Celeron J4005
9.200000
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

1560.000000
Intel Celeron J4005
8804.000000
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

Latest comparisons