Intel Celeron 847
Intel Celeron J1750
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron J1750. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2011
Intel Celeron 847
Intel Celeron 847
Released
Q3/2013
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Celeron J1750
Intel Celeron J1750

What's the best choice Intel Celeron 847 or Intel Celeron J1750? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron 847 has a base frequency of 1.10 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 17 W. Released in Q2/2011.

Intel Celeron J1750 has a base frequency of 2.41 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 10 W. Released in Q3/2013.

Differences

Intel Celeron 847 Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron 847
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron 847 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1030 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1238 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1267 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1566 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    859 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    879 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    775 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    812 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1161 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 119% better clock speed

    2.41 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    10 W left arrow 17 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron J1750 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1009 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1026 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1628 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    845 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    870 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    757 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    790 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1168 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
Intel Celeron J1750 Intel Celeron J1750
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron 800 left arrow Intel Celeron J1000/N2000
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 6
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    1.1 GHz left arrow 2.41 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    10.1 left arrow 11.2
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 4
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 7
  • GPU Frequency
    350 MHz left arrow 690 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU Turbo
    800 MHz left arrow 750 MHz
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Max. GPU Memory
    - left arrow 8 GB
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q3/2013
  • Shader
    48 left arrow 32
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 22 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron J1750 and Intel Celeron 847. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 2.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Celeron J1750 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    17 W left arrow 10 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Celeron J1750, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Sandy Bridge U left arrow Bay Trail
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    2 MB left arrow 1 MB
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q3/2013
  • Socket
    BGA 1023 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Celeron J1750.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

68.000000
Intel Celeron 847
73.000000
Intel Celeron J1750
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

77.000000
Intel Celeron 847
48.000000
Intel Celeron J1750
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

867.000000
Intel Celeron 847
915.000000
Intel Celeron J1750
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

1436.000000
Intel Celeron 847
1604.000000
Intel Celeron J1750
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

0.400000
Intel Celeron 847
0.440000
Intel Celeron J1750
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

0.600000
Intel Celeron 847
0.870000
Intel Celeron J1750
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

968.000000
Intel Celeron 847
943.000000
Intel Celeron J1750

Latest comparisons