What's the best choice Elbrus-16S or AMD Ryzen 5 3600? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Elbrus-16S has a base frequency of 2.0 GHz. 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 130 W. Released in Q2/2022.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in 2019-07-07.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
10 more cores
6
Common positions Elbrus-16S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
place
Higher clock speed
Around 80% better clock speed
2.0 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
130 W
Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 3600 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Elbrus-16S
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Ryzen
3
Desktop / Server
AMD Ryzen 3000
Desktops / Boxed Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 3000 Series
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
3.6 GHz
6
12
normal
Yes
4.2 GHz
Yes
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
None
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and Elbrus-16S. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Yes
2
DDR4
128 GB
PCIe 4.0 x16
20
4.0
3200
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Elbrus-16S and AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
65 W
65 W
95 °C
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S and AMD Ryzen 5 3600, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
-
3 MB
32 MB
2019-07-07
AM4
TSMC 7nm FinFET
Matisse (Zen 2)
Matisse
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
0.375 MB
100-100000031BOX
100-100000031MPK
100-000000031
Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition / Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
AMD Wraith Stealth
AMD Wraith Stealth
AMD-V, SVM
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 5835.6676 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 8 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Duration: 171.36 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Elbrus-16S and AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
