What's the best choice Baikal-T1 or AMD FX-6300? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Baikal-T1 has a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 3.9 W. Released in Q4/2016.
AMD FX-6300 has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 95 W. Released in Q4/2012.
Reasons to consider Performance per watt
times less performance per watt
95 W
Common positions Baikal-T1 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Higher clock speed
Around 66% better clock speed
1.2 GHz
More number of cores
About 3 times more cores
2
Common positions AMD FX-6300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Baikal-T1
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD FX
AMD FX-6300
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
3.50 GHz
6
6
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-6300 and Baikal-T1. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
32 GB
No
2
3.0
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Baikal-T1 and AMD FX-6300 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
95 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Baikal-T1 and Baikal-T1, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
--
32 nm
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Baikal-T1 and AMD FX-6300.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
