What's the best choice AMD E2-3800 or Intel Celeron J3160? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
AMD E2-3800 has a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 15 W. Released in Q4/2013.
Intel Celeron J3160 has a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 6 W. Released in Q1/2016.
Common positions AMD E2-3800 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Higher clock speed
Around 19% better clock speed
Performance per watt
About 0.4 times less performance per watt
Common positions Intel Celeron J3160 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron J3160 and AMD E2-3800. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD E2-3800 and Intel Celeron J3160 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD E2-3800 and AMD E2-3800, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD E2-3800 and Intel Celeron J3160.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!