What's the best choice Intel Xeon w9-3475X or Intel Xeon w7-3465X? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Intel Xeon w9-3475X has a base frequency of 2.20 GHz. 36 / 72 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 300 W. Released in Q1/2023.
Intel Xeon w7-3465X has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 28 / 56 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 300 W. Released in Q1/2023.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
8 more cores
28
Common positions Intel Xeon w9-3475X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 14% better clock speed
2.20 GHz
Common positions Intel Xeon w7-3465X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Intel Xeon W-3400
Intel Xeon W
12
Intel Xeon W-3365
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
2.5 GHz
normal
28x
28
56
Yes
Yes
4.8 GHz
-
3.2 GHz
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
no iGPU
No turbo
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Xeon w7-3465X and Intel Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Yes
4096 GB
307.2 GB/s
8 (Octa Channel)
DDR5-4800
5.0 x 112
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon w9-3475X and Intel Xeon w7-3465X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
97 °C
300 W
360 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon w9-3475X and Intel Xeon w7-3465X, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Sapphire Rapids-WS
Monolithic
Technical data sheet
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, AMX
75 MB
Windows 11, Windows Server, Linux
Q1/2023
2889 $
LGA 4677
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, VT-rp, vPro Enterprise
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon w9-3475X | 23620.503542 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 72 threads / windows System RAM: 128 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / Pro WS W790E-SAGE SE Duration: 423.361 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Xeon w7-3465X | 20320.825188 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.3 / 10M / 56 threads / windows System RAM: 1024 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Dell Inc. / 006CX9 Duration: 492.106 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon w9-3475X and Intel Xeon w7-3465X.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
