Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2013
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Released
Q4/2020
User rating
star star star star star
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000

What's the best choice Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 or HiSilicon Kirin 9000? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 has a base frequency of 2.70 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 130 W. Released in Q3/2013.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has a base frequency of 2.05 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q4/2020.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    143 left arrow place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 32% better clock speed

    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.05 GHz
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    12 left arrow 8
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 12% higher specified turbo frequency

    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.13 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    318 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    176 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    772 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    191 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    813 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    246 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    534 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    48 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    527 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    130 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    189 place

Positions in all rankings

Common positions HiSilicon Kirin 9000 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    369 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    471 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    49 place
  • AnTuTu 8 benchmark
    5 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v2 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 9000
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 9
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
  • Successor
    Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 left arrow -
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    - left arrow 1x Cortex-A77
  • B-Core
    - left arrow 3x Cortex-A77
  • Base Frequency
    2.7 GHz left arrow 2.05 GHz
  • C-Core
    - left arrow 4x Cortex-A55
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    12 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    24 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.5 GHz left arrow 3.13 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (12 Cores)
    3.1 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    - left arrow 2.54 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    - left arrow 12
  • Execution units
    - left arrow 24
  • Generation
    - left arrow Vallhall 2
  • GPU Frequency
    - left arrow 760 MHz
  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow ARM Mali-G78 MP24
  • GPU Turbo
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    - left arrow 1
  • Release date
    - left arrow Q4/2020
  • Shader
    - left arrow 384
  • Technology
    - left arrow 5 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 4
  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow LPDDR4X-2133LPDDR5-2750
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    130 W left arrow -
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge EP left arrow Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    30 MB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Socket
    LGA 2011 left arrow -
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

665.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
1063.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

7023.000000
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
3767.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000

Latest comparisons