What's the best choice Intel Core i5-12400 or Intel Core i5-12600K? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-12400 has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2022.
Intel Core i5-12600K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2021.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Common positions Intel Core i5-12400 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 48% better clock speed
More number of cores
4 more cores
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 11 % higher specified turbo frequency
Intel Core i5-12400
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-12600K and Intel Core i5-12400. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i5-12400 and Intel Core i5-12600K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i5-12400 and Intel Core i5-12600K, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400 | Intel Core i5-12600K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 161.025624 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 172.027686 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +6.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.342732 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 215.302947 samples/min Submissions: 35 | +39.5 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 143.354139 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 219.278982 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +53.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.761142 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 211.269775 samples/min Submissions: 38 | +42.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 142.514016 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 208.231011 samples/min Submissions: 37 | +46.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 153.97685 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 224.769114 samples/min Submissions: 32 | +46.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 156.81274 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 217.066649 samples/min Submissions: 96 | +38.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 5773.672055 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 10 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z690-P Duration: 173.2 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |