Intel Celeron J3160
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron J3160 vs AMD Phenom II X6 1035T. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Celeron J3160
Intel Celeron J3160
Released
Q3/2010
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T

What's the best choice Intel Celeron J3160 or AMD Phenom II X6 1035T? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron J3160 has a base frequency of 1.60 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. Released in Q1/2016.

AMD Phenom II X6 1035T has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz. 6 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 95 W. Released in Q3/2010.

Differences

  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    6 W left arrow 95 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron J3160 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1014 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    980 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1229 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1189 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1402 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    839 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    769 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    757 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    728 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    293 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1044 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 63% better clock speed

    2.60 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 more cores

    6 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 38 % higher specified turbo frequency

    3.10 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Phenom II X6 1035T CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    876 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    592 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    719 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    441 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    616 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    398 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    677 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron J3160 Intel Celeron J3160
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 left arrow AMD Phenom II - 1000
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow AMD Phenom II
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 5
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    1.6 GHz left arrow 2.6 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 6
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 6
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    2.24 GHz left arrow 3.1 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    2.24 GHz left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (6 Cores)
    - left arrow 3.1 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow -
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow -
  • Generation
    8 left arrow -
  • GPU Frequency
    320 MHz left arrow -
  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 400 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU Turbo
    700 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow -
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow -
  • Shader
    96 left arrow -
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow -
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Phenom II X6 1035T and Intel Celeron J3160. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR2-1066
  • PCIe lanes
    4 left arrow -
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron J3160 and AMD Phenom II X6 1035T Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    6 W left arrow 95 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron J3160 and AMD Phenom II X6 1035T, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Braswell left arrow Thuban (K10)
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE3, SSE4a
  • L3-Cache
    2 MB left arrow 6 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q3/2010
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow AM3
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow AMD-V

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron J3160 and AMD Phenom II X6 1035T.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

38.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
78.000000
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

Higher values are better in this metric.

136.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
419.000000
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

943.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
1621.000000
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

3161.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
7961.000000
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

0.440000
Intel Celeron J3160
0.940000
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

1.670000
Intel Celeron J3160
4.870000
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

1950.000000
Intel Celeron J3160
4917.000000
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T

Latest comparisons