Baikal-M
Intel Core i5-11260H
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Baikal-M vs Intel Core i5-11260H. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2019
Baikal-M
Baikal-M
Released
Q2/2021
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core i5-11260H
Intel Core i5-11260H

What's the best choice Baikal-M or Intel Core i5-11260H? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Baikal-M has a maximum frequency of 1.6 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 30 W. Released in Q3/2019.

Intel Core i5-11260H has a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 45 W. Released in Q2/2021.

Differences

Baikal-M Reasons to consider
Baikal-M
Report a bug
  • More number of cores

    2 times more cores

    8 left arrow 6
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    30 W left arrow 45 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Baikal-M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1083 place
  • CoreMark
    5 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    661 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 38% better clock speed

    2.60 GHz left arrow 1.6 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 52 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.40 GHz left arrow 2.1 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-11260H CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    154 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    187 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    241 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    177 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1050 place

Specifications

Technical data
Baikal-M Baikal-M
Intel Core i5-11260H Intel Core i5-11260H
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Baikal left arrow Intel Core i5
  • CPU group
    Baikal-M left arrow Intel Core i 11000H
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    1.5 GHz left arrow 2.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 6
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 12
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Arm Mali-T628 left arrow Intel UHD Graphics 11th Gen (16 EU)
  • GPU frequency
    0,7 GHz left arrow 0.35 GHz
  • Shader
    8 left arrow 128
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-11260H and Baikal-M. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3/DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Max. Memory
    128 left arrow 128 GB
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Baikal-M and Intel Core i5-11260H to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    30 W left arrow 45 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Baikal-M and Baikal-M, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • L2-Cache
    4x1024 KB left arrow 5.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    8 MB left arrow 12.00 MB
  • Architecture
    CortexA57 left arrow Tiger Lake H
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    FCBGA-1521 left arrow BGA 1787
  • Release date
    Q3/2019 left arrow Q2/2021

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Baikal-M and Intel Core i5-11260H.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Latest comparisons