AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
AMD Epyc 7F52
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs AMD Epyc 7F52. Specifications

User rating
star star star star star
Released
2019-09-30
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Released
Q2/2020
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Epyc 7F52
AMD Epyc 7F52

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 or AMD Epyc 7F52? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has a base frequency of 3.1 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in 2019-09-30.

AMD Epyc 7F52 has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 240 W. Released in Q2/2020.

Differences

  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 10% higher specified turbo frequency

    4.3 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    65 W left arrow 240 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    254 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    98 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    25 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    6 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    48 place
AMD Epyc 7F52 Reasons to consider
AMD Epyc 7F52
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 13% better clock speed

    3.50 GHz left arrow 3.1 GHz
  • More number of cores

    4 more cores

    16 left arrow 12

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Epyc 7F52 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    213 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
AMD Epyc 7F52 AMD Epyc 7F52
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    AMD Ryzen 3000 left arrow AMD Epyc 7002
  • Family
    Ryzen PRO left arrow AMD Epyc
  • Form Factor
    Desktops left arrow -
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 2
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Series
    Ryzen PRO 3000 Series left arrow -
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3.1 GHz left arrow 3.5 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    12 left arrow 16
  • CPU Threads
    24 left arrow 32
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4.3 GHz left arrow -
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    4.3 GHz left arrow 3.9 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (12 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow -
  • Turbo Frequency (16 Cores)
    - left arrow 3.7 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    None left arrow no iGPU
  • Graphics verification source
    https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/processors.html left arrow -
  • GPU Turbo
    - left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Epyc 7F52 and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow -
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 8
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0 left arrow -
  • PCIe lanes
    20 left arrow 128
  • PCIe version
    4.0 left arrow 4.0
  • System Memory Specification
    3200 left arrow -
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and AMD Epyc 7F52 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Default TDP
    65 W left arrow -
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    95 °C left arrow -
  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    65 W left arrow 240 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and AMD Epyc 7F52, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Matisse (Zen 2) left arrow Rome (Zen 2)
  • Codename
    Matisse left arrow -
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L1-Cache
    0.75 MB left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    6 MB left arrow -
  • L3-Cache
    64 MB left arrow 256 MB
  • Manufacturer product ID (tray)
    100-000000072 left arrow -
  • Official source
    https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/processors.html left arrow -
  • Operating systems
    Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit left arrow -
  • Release date
    2019-09-30 left arrow Q2/2020
  • Socket
    AM4 left arrow SP3
  • Technology
    TSMC 7nm FinFET left arrow 7 nm
  • Verification scope
    Explicit manufacturer fields refreshed; other original historical fields retained, not all reverified. Partial composite conflicts are preserved. left arrow -
  • Verified on
    2026-10-01 left arrow -
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V, SVM

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Latest comparisons