什么是最好的选择 Intel Xeon W-11155MRE 或 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Xeon W-11155MRE has a base frequency of 2.40 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q3/2021.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has a base frequency of 3.2 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 2021-01-12.
需要考虑的原因 共同立场 Intel Xeon W-11155MRE 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 33% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
4 more cores
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Xeon W-11155MRE
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 和 Intel Xeon W-11155MRE. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Xeon W-11155MRE 和 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Xeon W-11155MRE 和 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 618 points | System: Geekom A5 via Geekom CPU / power label: R7 5800H 54 W / 35 W Graphics: Vega 8 RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 86 points | System: Geekom A5 via Geekom CPU / power label: R7 5800H 54 W / 35 W Graphics: Vega 8 RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 4808.963909 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 8 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: LENOVO / INVALID Duration: 207.945 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 10819 points | System: Geekom A5 via Geekom CPU / power label: R7 5800H 54 W / 35 W Graphics: Vega 8 RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 1405 points | System: Geekom A5 via Geekom CPU / power label: R7 5800H 54 W / 35 W Graphics: Vega 8 RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 4229 points | System: Geekom A5 via Geekom CPU / power label: R7 5800H 54 W / 35 W Graphics: Vega 8 RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 551 points | System: Geekom A5 via Geekom CPU / power label: R7 5800H 54 W / 35 W Graphics: Vega 8 RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 1773 points | System: Geekom A5 via Geekom CPU / power label: R7 5800H 54 W / 35 W Graphics: Vega 8 RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 227 points | System: Geekom A5 via Geekom CPU / power label: R7 5800H 54 W / 35 W Graphics: Vega 8 RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Xeon W-11155MRE 和 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.