Intel Core i9-13900K vs Apple M2 Pro

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i9-13900K

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

7 地点
更高的时钟速度

左右 9% 更好的时钟速度

3.80 GHz 3.50 GHz
更多的核心数量

12 more cores

24 12

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i9-13900K 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

2 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

11 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

7 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

10 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

9 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

15 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

446 place

需要考虑的原因
Apple M2 Pro

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

41 地点
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

45 W 125 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Apple M2 Pro 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

37 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

68 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

47 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

41 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

9 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i9-13900K

Apple M2 Pro

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 13000 Apple M2
系列

Intel Core i9 Apple M series
一代人

13 2
过去的模式

Intel Core i9-12900K Apple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
分段

Desktop / Server Mobile
Successor

没有 -

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

A-Core

8x Raptor Cove / 3.80 GHz (5.70 GHz) 8x Avalanche
B-Core

16x Gracemont / 3.00 GHz (4.20 GHz) 4x Blizzard
Base Frequency

3.8 GHz -
核心架构

hybrid hybrid (big.LITTLE)
CPU核数

24 12
CPU线程

32 12
Hyperthreading / SMT

是没有
超频

没有没有
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

没有 -
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)

没有涡轮增压 -
A-Core Frequency

- 3.5 GHz
B-Core Frequency

- 2.8 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12 -
执行单位

32 256
一代人

12 2
GPU Frequency

400 MHz 1400 MHz
GPU名称

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 32 Apple M2 Pro (16 Core)
GPU Turbo

1450 MHz 没有涡轮增压
Max. displays

4 2
Max. GPU Memory

16 GB 32 GB
发布日期

Q4/2022 Q4/2022
着色器

256 2048
技术过程

10 nm 5 nm

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

Decode 没有
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode Conflicting source values: Decode | Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
JPEG

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
VC-1

Decode Decode
VP8

Decode Decode
VP9

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Apple M2 Pro 和 Intel Core i9-13900K. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

是没有
最大内存

128 GB 32 GB
Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s 204.8 GB/s
记忆通道

2 2 (Dual Channel)
存储器类型

DDR5-5600 LPDDR5-6400
PCIe

5.0 x 20 4.0

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 Apple M2 Pro Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 100 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

125 W 45 W
TDP (PL2)

241 W -
TDP down

没有 -
TDP up

没有 -

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 Apple M2 Pro, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Raptor Lake S M2
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation
L2-Cache

32 MB 36 MB
L2-Cache

36 MB -
发布日期

Q4/2022 Q2/2022
插座

LGA 1700 -
技术过程

10 nm 5 nm
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Apple Virtualization Framework
Chip design

- Chiplet
Operating systems

- macOS, iPadOS

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i9-13900K

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux 596.916385 samples/min
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 506.012269 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 569.007612 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 487.07809 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 536.977328 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 480.196647 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 592.433754 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 466.656168 samples/min

More results: 7

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 523.732424 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 464.937348 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 543.710413 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 483.50998 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 508.883555 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 521.395074 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 522.80092 samples/min

Apple M2 Pro

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / macOS 197.768517 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / macOS 198.991429 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / macOS 196.971498 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / macOS 202.698394 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / macOS 197.741186 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / macOS 205.788253 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / macOS 240.697281 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / macOS 191.316769 samples/min

Results with primary test sources

Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.

Model	Test	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R15 / multi-core	6191 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R15 / single-core	327 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R20 / multi-core	15181 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R20 / single-core	828 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R23 / multi-core	40103 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090
Intel Core i9-13900K	Cinebench R23 / single-core	2267 points	Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i9-13900K	9028.644277 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i9-13900K 和 Apple M2 Pro.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 SC是一个适用于macOs和Windows的跨平台测试套件，使用一个CPU核心，没有超线性。

Higher values are better in this metric.

2267.000000

Intel Core i9-13900K

1695.000000

Apple M2 Pro

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 MC是一个跨平台测试套件，适用于macOs和Windows，采用多核和超线程技术。

Higher values are better in this metric.

38460.000000