什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i9-13900H 或 Intel Core i5-12600K? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i5-12600K has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2021.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
4 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i9-13900H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i9-13900H
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-12600K 和 Intel Core i9-13900H. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i9-13900H 和 Intel Core i5-12600K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i9-13900H 和 Intel Core i5-12600K, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Core i5-12600K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 214.871098 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 221.289555 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +3.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 165.950779 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 172.027686 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +3.7 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 239.172077 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 270.839071 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +13.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 215.302947 samples/min Submissions: 35 | +17.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 219.278982 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +11.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 211.269775 samples/min Submissions: 38 | +2.6 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 195.081862 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 276.530758 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +41.8 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 208.231011 samples/min Submissions: 37 | +37.5 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 224.769114 samples/min Submissions: 32 | +11.6 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 258.238432 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 269.902678 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +4.5 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | 217.066649 samples/min Submissions: 96 | +2.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 5773.672055 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 10 threads / linux System RAM: 32 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z690-P Duration: 173.2 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |