什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-12700KF 或 Intel Core i9-13980HX? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-12700KF has a base frequency of 3.60 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2021.
Intel Core i9-13980HX has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
12 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i9-13980HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i7-12700KF
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i9-13980HX 和 Intel Core i7-12700KF. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-12700KF 和 Intel Core i9-13980HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-12700KF 和 Intel Core i9-13980HX, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700KF | Intel Core i9-13980HX | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 299.652343 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 392.232359 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +30.9 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 261.198774 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 370.906612 samples/min Submissions: 9 | +42.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 283.116113 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 424.282467 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +49.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 289.770122 samples/min Submissions: 95 | 335.267439 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +15.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 274.137726 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 344.501215 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +25.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 276.449649 samples/min Submissions: 55 | 315.406209 samples/min Submissions: 44 | +14.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 273.398609 samples/min Submissions: 43 | 359.268813 samples/min Submissions: 58 | +31.4 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 360.121925 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 441.470741 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +22.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 289.715603 samples/min Submissions: 24 | 372.441003 samples/min Submissions: 44 | +28.6 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 347.011907 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 252.715053 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -27.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 278.887706 samples/min Submissions: 43 | 385.360995 samples/min Submissions: 54 | +38.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13980HX | 3681.424269 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / G614JV Duration: 271.634 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700KF | 7153.689873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760 GAMING X DDR4 Duration: 139.788 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |