什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-12700H 或 Intel Core i7-13700HX? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i7-12700H has a base frequency of 2.30 GHz. 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i7-13700HX has a base frequency of 1.80 GHz (5.00 GHz). 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
55 W
共同立场 Intel Core i7-12700H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
2 more cores
14
共同立场 Intel Core i7-13700HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i7-12700H
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i 13000H
Intel Core i7
13
Intel Core i7-12800HX
Mobile
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Raptor Cove
8x Gracemont
-
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
16
24
是
没有
-
-
1.80 GHz (5.00 GHz)
1.80 GHz (3.70 GHz)
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
12
32
11
300 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics 770
1500 MHz
3
64 GB
Q4/2021
256
10 nm
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-13700HX 和 Intel Core i7-12700H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
是
128 GB
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR4-3200DDR5-5600LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-5200
5.0 x 20
89.6 GB/s
是
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-12700H 和 Intel Core i7-13700HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
55 W
157 W
45 W
86 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-12700H 和 Intel Core i7-13700HX, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Raptor Lake H
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
24 MB
30 MB
Q1/2023
BGA 1744
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Monolithic
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Shared tests with results for both models: 8
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700H | Intel Core i7-13700HX | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 155.843375 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 231.211956 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +48.4 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 171.747624 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 250.030484 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +45.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 171.366816 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 226.624389 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +32.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 194.511825 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 225.501814 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +15.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.836398 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 210.854982 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +21.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 166.642257 samples/min Submissions: 57 | 229.250067 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +37.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 171.496699 samples/min Submissions: 27 | 254.761787 samples/min Submissions: 35 | +48.6 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 185.722833 samples/min Submissions: 88 | 259.632348 samples/min Submissions: 62 | +39.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13700HX | 6443.714157 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 22 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: HP / 8BB0 Duration: 155.19 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i7-12700H 和 Intel Core i7-13700HX.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
