Intel Core i5-8300H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i5-8300H

报告一个错误

Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

45 W 105 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i5-8300H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

288 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

290 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

251 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

362 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

448 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

515 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

743 place
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

110 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

96 place
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

222 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

101 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

217 place
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

71 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

433 place

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

65 地点
更高的时钟速度

左右 65% 更好的时钟速度

3.8 GHz 2.30 GHz
更多的核心数量

4 more cores

8 4
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 18 % higher specified turbo frequency

4.7 GHz 4.00 GHz

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

58 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

70 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

41 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

65 place
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

12 place
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

74 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

109 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

97 place
Monero Hashrate kH/s

32 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

62 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i5-8300H

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 8000H AMD Ryzen 5000
系列

Intel Core i5 Ryzen
一代人

8 4
过去的模式

- AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
分段

Mobile Desktop
Form Factor

- Desktops / Boxed Processor
Series

- Ryzen 5000 Series

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

2.3 GHz 3.8 GHz
核心架构

normal normal
CPU核数

4 8
CPU线程

8 16
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
超频

没有是
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

4 GHz 4.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

3.6 GHz -
Max. Boost Clock

- 4.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)

- 4.4 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12 -
执行单位

24 -
一代人

9.5 -
GPU Frequency

300 MHz -
GPU名称

Intel HD Graphics 630 None
GPU Turbo

1100 MHz -
Max. displays

3 -
Max. GPU Memory

64 GB -
发布日期

Q2/2016 -
着色器

192 -
技术过程

14 nm -

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

没有没有
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode 没有
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode 没有
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode 没有
JPEG

Decode / Encode 没有
VC-1

Decode 没有
VP8

Decode / Encode 没有
VP9

Decode / Encode 没有

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 和 Intel Core i5-8300H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

没有是
最大内存

64 GB 128 GB
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM DDR4
PCIe通道

16 20
PCIe版本

3.0 4.0
PCIe

- PCIe 4.0
System Memory Specification

- 3200

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-8300H 和 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

- 90 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

45 W 105 W
Default TDP

- 105 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-8300H 和 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Coffee Lake H Vermeer (Zen 3)
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L2-Cache

- 4 MB
L2-Cache

8 MB 32 MB
发布日期

Q2/2018 2020-11-05
插座

BGA 1440 AM4
技术过程

14 nm TSMC 7nm FinFET
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d AMD-V, SVM
Codename

- Vermeer

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i5-8300H

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux 248.932305 samples/min
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 203.037866 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 245.617692 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 203.822985 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 243.986623 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 194.110194 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 236.257691 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 197.377448 samples/min

More results: 10

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 241.730232 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 195.366501 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 252.417386 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 203.851614 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Linux 245.934632 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 225.384328 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux 238.790662 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 219.538655 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 236.651564 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 211.424763 samples/min

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X	8091.138585 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 24 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Duration: 123.592 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-8300H 和 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 SC是一个高负荷的CPU测试，适用于台式机或笔记本电脑上的长时间任务，使用一个CPU核心，没有超负荷的情况。

Higher values are better in this metric.

397.000000

Intel Core i5-8300H

628.000000

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 MC是一个高负荷的CPU测试，用于测试台式机或笔记本电脑上的长任务，使用多核和超线程技术。

Higher values are better in this metric.

1689.000000