产品系列示意图。 Credit: Intel Corporation.
产品系列示意图。 Credit: Intel Corporation.
什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-14600K 或 Intel Core i9-14900K? 哪种处理器更快？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-14600K has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2023.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2023.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 9% 更好的时钟速度
3.20 GHz
共同立场 Intel Core i5-14600K 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
10 more cores
14
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 13 % higher specified turbo frequency
5.30 GHz
共同立场 Intel Core i9-14900K 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
Intel Core i5-14600K
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i (14th Gen)
Desktop
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
3.2 GHz
24
32
2.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
16
3.2 GHz
5.6 GHz
8
6 GHz
6 GHz
5.8 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
32
300 MHz
Intel UHD Graphics 770
1650 MHz
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i9-14900K 和 Intel Core i5-14600K. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
192 GB
2
DDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-14600K 和 Intel Core i9-14900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
125 W
253 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-14600K 和 Intel Core i5-14600K, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Raptor Lake
36 MB
32 MB
36 MB
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/236773/intel-core-i9-processor-14900k-36m-cache-up-to-6-00-ghz/specifications.html
Q4/2023
FCLGA1700
Intel 7
2026-09-30
Official median of community submissions. Higher is better; each row uses the same version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test | Intel Core i5-14600K | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 319.765092 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 527.131144 samples/min Submissions: 69 |
Data snapshot: 2026-09-30. Official source
This aggregates different user systems. Individual measurement dates, RAM, drivers and power limits are unknown. Results are excluded from the legacy composite index.
No comparable legacy benchmark results are available.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
