什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-12400 或 AMD Ryzen 5 5600? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i5-12400 has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 has a base frequency of 3.5 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2022-04-04.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
共同立场 Intel Core i5-12400 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 40% 更好的时钟速度
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 5 5600 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-12400
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 5 5600 和 Intel Core i5-12400. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-12400 和 AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-12400 和 AMD Ryzen 5 5600, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 10
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400 | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 162.516755 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 154.347433 samples/min Submissions: 23 | -5.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 161.025624 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 158.029692 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -1.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.342732 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 149.032866 samples/min Submissions: 110 | -3.4 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 178.813618 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 171.717667 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -4.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 143.354139 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 144.564638 samples/min Submissions: 65 | +0.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 194.13566 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 179.371336 samples/min Submissions: 11 | -7.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.761142 samples/min Submissions: 17 | 141.645759 samples/min Submissions: 72 | -4.8 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 142.514016 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 140.994483 samples/min Submissions: 92 | -1.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 153.97685 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 143.422344 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -6.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 156.81274 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 149.964113 samples/min Submissions: 123 | -4.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | 6640.855874 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 150.583 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-12400 和 AMD Ryzen 5 5600.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.