什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i3-12100F 或 Intel Core i7-13700HX? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i3-12100F has a base frequency of 3.30 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 58 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i7-13700HX has a base frequency of 1.80 GHz (5.00 GHz). 16 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 共同立场 Intel Core i3-12100F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
12 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i7-13700HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i3-12100F
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-13700HX 和 Intel Core i3-12100F. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i3-12100F 和 Intel Core i7-13700HX Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i3-12100F 和 Intel Core i7-13700HX, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i3-12100F | Intel Core i7-13700HX | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 109.696716 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 250.030484 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +127.9 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 105.417603 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 226.624389 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +115.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 103.800526 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 225.501814 samples/min Submissions: 8 | +117.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 103.238041 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 210.854982 samples/min Submissions: 26 | +104.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 98.290891 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 229.250067 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +133.2 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 103.705581 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 254.761787 samples/min Submissions: 35 | +145.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 101.812902 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 259.632348 samples/min Submissions: 62 | +155.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-13700HX | 6443.714157 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 22 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: HP / 8BB0 Duration: 155.19 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-12100F | 3891.762307 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 6 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48) Duration: 256.953 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |