什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 或 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has a base frequency of 4.5 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 170 W. 发布于 2022-09-27.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has a base frequency of 3.8 GHz. 24 / 48 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 280 W. 发布于 2019-11-25.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 18% 更好的时钟速度
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 27% higher specified turbo frequency
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更多的核心数量
8 more cores
共同立场 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 和 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 和 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 555.14446 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 537.007553 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -3.3 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 640.195415 samples/min Submissions: 60 | 575.144457 samples/min Submissions: 9 | -10.2 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 539.85203 samples/min Submissions: 186 | 507.849063 samples/min Submissions: 15 | -5.9 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 521.842157 samples/min Submissions: 504 | 509.39129 samples/min Submissions: 14 | -2.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 527.799756 samples/min Submissions: 470 | 515.517252 samples/min Submissions: 12 | -2.3 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 550.882976 samples/min Submissions: 294 | 518.786537 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -5.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 546.570676 samples/min Submissions: 593 | 506.847355 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -7.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6236 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 317 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 14891 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 783 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 38248 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2017 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 System RAM: 32 GB |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 10417.426271 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Duration: 95.993 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 26624.777017 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 48 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / TRX40 AORUS MASTER Duration: 37.559 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 和 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.