什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 9 7900 或 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2023-01-14.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a base frequency of 4.4 GHz. 12 / 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 120 W. 发布于 2023-02-28.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 7900 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 19% 更好的时钟速度
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 4 % higher specified turbo frequency
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7900. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 9 7900 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 9 7900 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 9
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 434.607956 samples/min Submissions: 71 | 480.352919 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +10.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 370.502053 samples/min Submissions: 72 | 395.565804 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +6.8 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 361.246155 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 383.592003 samples/min Submissions: 21 | +6.2 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 444.072007 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 472.761018 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +6.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 388.422041 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 380.56783 samples/min Submissions: 43 | -2.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 435.700715 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 478.451628 samples/min Submissions: 5 | +9.8 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 360.683488 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 388.704712 samples/min Submissions: 88 | +7.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 371.969605 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 384.317866 samples/min Submissions: 32 | +3.3 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 371.910741 samples/min Submissions: 72 | 397.901848 samples/min Submissions: 44 | +7.0 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 15889.384461 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 24 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 629.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 16179.397156 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 61.807 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 9 7900 和 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.