什么是最好的选择 AMD Ryzen 9 3900 或 Intel Core i9-13900KF? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 has a base frequency of 3.10 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q3/2019.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2022.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 9 3900 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更多的核心数量
12 more cores
共同立场 Intel Core i9-13900KF 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i9-13900KF 和 AMD Ryzen 9 3900. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 9 3900 和 Intel Core i9-13900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 9 3900 和 Intel Core i9-13900KF, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 3
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 9 3900 | Intel Core i9-13900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 247.120881 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 477.248565 samples/min Submissions: 46 | +93.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 239.781173 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 454.997543 samples/min Submissions: 69 | +89.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 235.988593 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 498.99971 samples/min Submissions: 76 | +111.5 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 3900 | 14066.379244 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 24 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 710.915 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KF | 12476.450699 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 64 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME Z790-P Duration: 80.151 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 9 3900 和 Intel Core i9-13900KF.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.