AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs Intel Core i7-12700H

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

83 地点
更高的时钟速度

左右 17% 更好的时钟速度

2.7 GHz 2.30 GHz
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 1% higher specified turbo frequency

4.75 GHz 4.70 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

28 W 45 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

57 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

80 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

60 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

73 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

139 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

163 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

32 place

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i7-12700H

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

59 地点
更多的核心数量

6 more cores

14 8

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i7-12700H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

32 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

57 place
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

25 place
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

42 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

139 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

106 place
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

67 place

规格

技术数据

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Intel Core i7-12700H

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

AMD Ryzen 6000U Intel Core i 12000H
系列

Ryzen PRO Intel Core i7
Form Factor

Laptops / Desktops -
一代人

5 12
分段

Mobile Mobile
Series

Ryzen PRO 6000 Series -

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

2.7 GHz 2.3 GHz
核心架构

normal hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Core Configuration

8x Zen 3+ -
CPU核数

8 14
CPU线程

16 20
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
Max. Boost Clock

4.75 GHz -
超频

没有没有
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

4.73 GHz 4.7 GHz
A-Core

- 6x Golden Cove
B-Core

- 8x Gracemont
Turbo Frequency (14 Cores)

- 3.8 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

DirectX Version

12 12.1
执行单位

12 96
一代人

9 13
GPU Frequency

2200 MHz 400 MHz
GPU名称

AMD Radeon 680M Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
GPU Turbo

2200 MHz 1400 MHz
Graphics Cores

12 -
Max. displays

3 4
Max. GPU Memory

8 GB 64 GB
发布日期

Q1/2022 Q1/2022
着色器

768 768
技术过程

6 nm 10 nm

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

Decode Decode
H.264 / AVC

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
JPEG

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
VC-1

Decode Decode
VP8

Decode / Encode Decode
VP9

Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-12700H 和 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

没有没有
最大内存

64 GB 64 GB
Memory Bandwidth

76.8 GB/s -
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

DDR5 DDR4-3200DDR5-4800LPDDR4X-4266LPDDR5-5200
PCIe

PCIe 4.0 4.0 x 20

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 和 Intel Core i7-12700H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Configurable TDP

15-28 W -
Default TDP

28 W -
Maximum Operating Temperature

95 °C 100 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

15 W 45 W
TDP (PL2)

- 115 W
TDP up

28 W -

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 和 Intel Core i7-12700H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Alder Lake H
Codename

Rembrandt -
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
L1-Cache

0.5 MB -
L2-Cache

4 MB 11.5 MB
L2-Cache

16 MB 24 MB
Manufacturer product ID (tray)

100-000000781 -
Operating systems

Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition / Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition / RHEL x86 64-Bit / Ubuntu x86 64-Bit -
发布日期

Q2/2022 Q1/2022
插座

FP7 BGA 1744
技术过程

TSMC 6nm FinFET 10 nm
虚拟化

AMD-V, SVM VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Intel Core i7-12700H

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux 282.531205 samples/min
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 185.722833 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 210.522717 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 171.496699 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 227.527826 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 166.642257 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 220.248805 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 173.836398 samples/min

More results: 9

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 160.170807 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 194.511825 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 183.839528 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 171.366816 samples/min
Blender 5.0.0 / CPU / Linux 218.186226 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 189.136701 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux 201.516106 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 171.747624 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 179.157041 samples/min

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 17 threads / linux

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i7-12700H	6305.822292 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 17 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: LENOVO / INVALID Duration: 1585.836 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 和 Intel Core i7-12700H.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 SC是一个适用于macOs和Windows的跨平台测试套件，使用一个CPU核心，没有超线性。

Higher values are better in this metric.

1613.000000

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

1806.000000

Intel Core i7-12700H

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Maxon的Cinebench R23 MC是一个跨平台测试套件，适用于macOs和Windows，采用多核和超线程技术。

Higher values are better in this metric.

14369.000000